Showing posts with label political communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political communication. Show all posts

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Book: Arguing for our lives: a user's guide to constructive dialog

Why Politics at the Dinner Table Is Good for Democracy by Andy Lee Roth — YES! Magazine:

"Defying the conventional wisdom that we get along best by avoiding public talk about religion or politics, Robert Jensen asks, “What else is there of interest to discuss?” In Arguing For Our Lives: A User’s Guide to Constructive Dialog he proposes that restoring our lost faith in “the possibility of honest argumentation in public” requires honing our critical thinking skills and putting them to more frequent use. Democracy, he reminds us, begins in conversation."

'via Blog this'

Friday, May 9, 2014

Quiz: How Politically Engaged Are You?

Quiz: How Politically Engaged Are You? - NationalJournal.com:

"So, while polling shows support for the president and Congress hovering around all-time lows, there's still room for positive action in local communities."

'via Blog this'

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Let’s Start Practicing Civil Discourse

Let’s Start Practicing Civil Discourse by George Wolfe | InterMix:
  • Mediation is a process that can be used to resolve disputes between parties in conflict. The approach stipulates certain ground rules that can also be applied to our daily conversations with friends, colleagues, rivals and strangers. If these simple rules are observed and practiced when we engage in interfaith dialog, personal conversation and group discussion, rhetoric that can lead to misunderstanding and conflict is minimized. Our problem-solving efforts will then be far more constructive, increasing our chances of finding common ground. What follows is a list of mediation ground rules that I have modified to fit the forums of personal and public discourse.
See discourse ground rules.

'via Blog this'


Monday, March 18, 2013

Occucards are educational outreach cards for activists

Occucards.Com:


  • Hello. We are a collective of Occupy activists who came together to produce educational outreach literature for the movement. On this site you can download free, hi-res versions of our 4″x6″ info cards to print yourself, or you can purchase glossy, card-stock versions from us. (The text is on the back of each card.) Our prices are below what we pay to produce the cards, and thus we rely on donations to keep going. Unlike Wall Street, our finances are open and transparent.
    • Current Cards: Goldman Sachs Corporate Personhood Health Care The Military Industrial Complex The Monetary System The National Defense Authorization Act Monsanto The Prison Industrial Complex Climate Change Wells Fargo Drone Attacks Student Debt Fracking ALEC Republicrats Walmart Austerity NEW!!! Tar Sands NEW!!!


    'via Blog this'

    Saturday, February 9, 2013

    10 Points of Politics

    10 Points of Politics


    politics is an asset.
    success lies in how active you are politically.
    does a law matter? ask another politician.
    success is the key to gaining assets.
    to be successful requires access to your own lawmakers.
    ideally, all constituents are political.
    Representatives and senators serve their level of government.
    the nation is successful when all constituents are political.
    all citizens are responsible for the success of all levels of government.
    activism is access to your own representatives in government.



    Friday, December 21, 2012

    An alternative to highly-partisan negotiation efforts

    Why Post-Partisanship Is Not Mush In The Middle | No Labels:

    A post-partisan analysis would take a “two-poled” approach.  Post-partisans assume that both liberal and conservative concerns are legitimate. This is a good-good situation.  Both groups are well-intentioned; both groups have valid insights.  Both groups are correctly describing an aspect of our total experience.

    'via Blog this'

    Saturday, October 13, 2012

    Video: The Week in Political Spending

    Video: The Week in Political Spending - Sunlight Foundation Blog:
    Sunlight kicks off today a new Election 2012 video series called the Political Weather Report. Even if it's dark money clouds in Ohio or a monsoon of super PAC ads in Nevada, our weather report provides you with two minutes of "sunshine." Watch this week's episode and get the forecast for the cities with the most political ads and the accumulation of outside money so far this month.
    New update video every Friday until General Election Day.

    'via Blog this'

    Wednesday, September 26, 2012

    Flashback to 2008: America's war economy

    America's Outrageous War Economy!:
    Americans zone out playing video war games. We nod at 90-second news clips of Afghan war casualties and collateral damage in Georgia. We laugh at Jon Stewart's dark comedic news and Ben Stiller's new war spoof "Tropic Thunder" ... all the while silently, by default, we enable our rulers as they aggressively expand America's War Economy, a relentless machine that needs a steady diet of war after war. Americans surrender 54% of their tax dollars to a war machine, which consumes 47% of the world's total military budgets. 

    'via Blog this'

    Monday, September 24, 2012

    Saturday, August 18, 2012

    Preferable qualities of dialogue over debate

    >> "Characteristics of Arts-Based Civic Dialogue: Debate Versus Dialogue"
    Animating Democracy


    Check out this table infographic comparing the participation aspects of debates versus dialogue. Civic engagement is a positive force for change.  In today's heated political environment, we must never forget that if we don't move forward in this nation (America), we'll be back-sliding into irrelevance on a global scale.



    Friday, August 3, 2012

    Is most of today's rhetoric by politicians helpful or harmful to the public?


    rhetoric   The art of using language so as to persuade or influence others. Although rhetoric is apparently opposed to the philosophical ideal of the exact pursuit of truth, their reconciliation has sometimes seemed desirable, most notably to Cicero. If one thinks of philosophy as a matter of argument rather than doctrine, as the academic sceptics did, then rhetoric is good practice in argument. The cultivation of this art was an important study in medieval universities, and began to regain ground with the belief, widely shared in the late 20th century, that all discourse and argument contains a political and persuasive core. See also postmodernism.  

    The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Simon Blackburn. Oxford University Press, 2008. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press.  David Weller.  3 August 2012  <http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t98.e2716>


    Today's politicians -- at least on the state and federal levels -- often engage in rhetoric to make their argument on an issue or idea.  Most news articles and blog posts have reported elected officials' and candidates' use of it in a negative light.

    To illustrate this point, here are quotes from civic engagement-oriented organizations' stories.

    A new FOX News poll throws into relief the effect anti-immigrant rhetoric has had on Latinos' views of the Republican Party and its presumptive presidential nominee, Mitt Romney.  ~ Miryam Hazán, Demos, Mar 21, 2012

    A moderate rejects all of this. A moderate would reject that this country started as a polyarchy and is now an oligarchy. A moderate talks about the pluralist representative democracy we need to cherish and save. A moderate indulges in the rhetoric of partisanship, wants to be viewed as an independent, acknowledges the basic truisms of the most fashionable ideology all while tacking to the political center in matters of political survival.  ~ Larry Allred, Ballot Access News, May 12, 2012

    Moreover, it is worth remembering that the Affordable Care Act, despite the harsh rhetoric leveled at it, is actually a fairly moderate incremental reform. Critics paint “Obamacare” as socialist, or worse. But it is a far cry from a “single payer” plan...  ~ Keesha Gaskins, Brennan Center for Justice, 06/29/12

    Clear away the rhetoric, and what's mainly left are the odd early exit polls (which did show Kerry's lead in Ohio and Florida declining as Election Day went on and which ended up with the current national Bush-Kerry spread), troubling instances of bad electronic voting, and curious--or possibly curious--trends in Florida.  ~ David Corn, The Nation, Nov 9, 2004

    Of course, Obama’s rhetoric mattered immensely. “Hope” and “change” were tremendously attractive ideas, in part because they were simultaneously amorphous and positive: their almost calculated lack of specificity let each supporter layer his or her own expectations onto them freely. And besides providing supporters a powerful brand under whose umbrella they could gather, the overarching Obama image was a wonderful tool for recruiting friends, neighbors and family. Yes We Can! Come 2009, when lofty campaign rhetoric encountered the meat-grinder of the legislative process, the realities of governing would naturally come as a shock.  ~ cpd, e.politics, Aug 11, 2011

    Does rhetoric have a value in political discourse, and, if so, has it generally been used properly or has it been too often abused by politicians?  Facts are always important, but are they always available?



    Thursday, July 19, 2012

    A list of integrity considerations for the Occupy movement

    What Integrity to the Occupy Movement Demands of Us | Dissident Voice: 'via Blog this'

    What Integrity to the Occupy Movement Demands of Us
    by Joseph G. Ramsey
    Dissident Voice
    July 18th, 2012

    Joseph G. Ramsey is a writer, scholar, critic, educator, and activist in Somerville, Massachusetts. He is co-editor of Cultural Logic: an electronic journal of marxist theory and practice, and a participant in the Kasama Project. He can be reached at: jgramsey@gmail.com. Read other articles by Joseph, or visit Joseph's website.


    Work Cited (Using MLA 7):
    Ramsey, Joseph G. "What Integrity to the Occupy Movement Demands of Us." Web log post. Dissident Voice. Dissident Voice, 18 July 2012. Web. 19 July 2012.


    Thursday, June 7, 2012

    Be kind -- that's sustainable politics

         Why has the Occupy movement petered out so much?  Why isn't there an active organization of local groups against the Citizens United court decision?  Why are Americans being constantly bombarded with different forms of government and corporate spying?  Why do millionaire lobbyists have free access to critical points of legislation?

          We are not a people-centered society anymore, but a money-centered one.  There is a hollow existence to daily life, where financial comfort is the way of life.  And only those already comfortable can and will get more rich.  And the way one attains money these days leave open any quasi-legal means of doing so.

         If we are to be united again as a country, we must not forget who our 'neighbors' are.  We must care about their quality of life, while caring for ours.  We must constantly choose charity and service over advantage and competition.  Humanity is the ultimate quality of life.  Mercy reminds us of such sentiments...  Be kind.



    Wednesday, May 23, 2012

    Legalization of federal domestic propaganda an amendment in the defense authorization bill

    From:  Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban, by Michael Hastings  |  BuzzFeed



    • An amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on American audiences is being inserted into the latest defense authorization bill.

    • The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the independent Broadcasting Board of Governors, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee's official website.

    • The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns.

    • The bi-partisan amendment is sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington State.

    • According to a source on the Hill, the law would allow "U.S. propaganda intended to influence foreign audiences to be used on the domestic population."  The new law would give sweeping powers to the government to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public.

    • “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.”

    • A U.S. Army whistleblower, Lieutenant Col. Daniel Davis, noted recently in his scathing 84-page unclassified report on Afghanistan that there remains a strong desire within the defense establishment “to enable Public Affairs officers to influence American public opinion when they deem it necessary to "protect a key friendly center of gravity, to wit US national will," he wrote, quoting a well-regarded general.

    • The defense bill passed the House Friday afternoon.


    The entire original article.



    Saturday, May 19, 2012

    Defining uncivil political behavior

    From:  What Does it Mean to be Civil? by Hal Movius  |  Civil Politics.org



    • People on the Left and Right weigh different moral principles as a basis for deciding what is moral and just, and what isn’t.   If we accept that differing moral instincts can guide political behavior and reasoning, and confront the reality of a splintered media landscape, it seems to me that we need a more nuanced definition of “civility”.

    • We need one that expands on the narrow notion of remaining interpersonally calm and cordial and using careful, inoffensive language.

    • An expanded view of what it means to be “civil” might require three related forms of analysis:

    • A rhetorical analysis of the politeness of the tone and language used in communications between those parties.  This is currently the most common and narrowest form of analysis.

    • A consequentialist analysis of the estimated consequences of policies themselves from different points of view (e.g. through a lens of moral principles).  This analysis would almost always require clarification of the assumptions made by parties in forecasting the effects of policies. For example, Democrats and Republicans strongly disagree on the likely effects of tax rate reductions.

    • An instrumental analysis of the good faith of disagreeing parties to negotiate with a goal of meeting one another’s most important interests (i.e., underlying goals and concerns).   If one proceeds with a multifaceted view of what it means to be “civil” then it becomes more possible to see how parties who strongly disagree might reasonably see themselves as being “civil” and see the other side quite differently.


    Please read the rest of the article for details.



    Tuesday, April 17, 2012

    We Must Cut Our Own 'Puppet Strings' of Political Labels

    From: Puppets of Politics | No Labels


    • We are now in the label wars. Everyone wants to define, control, and spread their labels, before the other guy. Conversely, politics has become a game of label the other guy, the other side, or the other belief before you, your side, or your belief can be labeled.

    • Just think about Occupy Wall Street. It was all labels, not even an attempt at substantive proposals. And to some extent, it worked. It achieved its goal of label creation and manipulation.

    • Most of us have become used to following the labels, and it is the labeling that can make us all political puppets.  Labels are strings, and strings are hard to see. When we label a person or a group, we tie a string to them and to ourselves. Labels define, and thus control and influence, actions. Labels manipulate behavior and outcomes.

    • By acceding to labels, we allow ourselves to become puppets of politics. We permit ourselves to be manipulated. We let ourselves have our strings pulled, our points of view manipulated, and sometimes we don’t even recognize it.

    • We do not always see the strings pulling and tugging on us, directing our movements. And just like a puppet, we can sometimes move too easily, jump too quickly, and take steps too abruptly.

    • In a World Working Well, we would all cut our strings - the strings we have and the strings we impose. In a World Working Well, there would be No Labels. There would be no strings.

    • Art Bushkin is a writer, philanthropist and social activist. His principal causes are Harnessing the Power of Technology for Social Good and Devout Politics: A World Working Well. For more on Art, check out ArtBushkin.com.



    Spread.us



    Monday, September 5, 2011

    Tue 7:30pm ET: Join the No Labels telephone town hall and end partisan gridlock

    From: No Labels
    Telephone town hall with Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz Tuesday Sept. 6 at 7:30 p.m. eastern

    • On Tuesday night (Sept. 6), I’m talking with Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz about how to end the partisan gridlock paralyzing Washington in a nationwide telephone town hall hosted by No Labels. Join me: http://hq.nolabels.org/schultz_call
    • Three weeks ago, Schultz asked other business leaders to urge Congress and President Obama to end the partisan gridlock paralyzing Washington. More than 100 executives joined him in signing a two-part pledge: 
    • 1. To withhold campaign contributions until Washington reaches a fair, bipartisan deal on our country’s long-term economic future. 
    • 2. To hire workers. American businesses can make a positive impact on our economy through a commitment to doing everything possible to accelerate job creation. 
    • Since then, Schultz has heard from Americans across the country who are losing hope in the American dream. It’s time to bring that confidence back. Click here to join me on the Tuesday night call: http://hq.nolabels.org/schultz_call


    Friday, August 19, 2011

    People can overcome propaganda and hate speech with civic engagement

    We are sharing this entire article, as all of its content is vitally important.  Thank you to the NCoC, and the Holocaust Museum for having taken on this very critical political civic engagement issue during NCoC's recent conference.  It is we, the people's responsibility to make the right choices when our society is confronted with any political communication, whether it be anonymously financed or not.

    NCoC-- National Conference on Citizenship
    "Power in the Spoken Word: Propaganda, Hate Speech, and Civic Engagement"


    In a world where violence and sorrow often prevail, how do we create an environment where hate cannot flourish? This was a central question for discussion at a leadership summit titled “What You Do Matters,” a conference hosted by the Holocaust Museum on the weekend of June 28th, 2011. The summit presented new ways of thinking about hate speech, propaganda and civic engagement.

    What is propaganda? The conference introduced the concept of propaganda by providing firsthand accounts of genocide and hate speech in a series of lectures and discussions over the course of the weekend. Carl Wilkins, the only American survivor to remain in Rwanda during the genocide in the early 1990’s, spoke about trust and facilitating peace in times of turmoil. Robert Behr, Holocaust survivor, talked about his experience living in Germany during Hitler’s rule. Bill Adair, Politifact.com editor and the Washington Bureau Chief for the St. Petersburg Times, gave a lecture on the importance of holding people accountable to their words. Amy Lazarus, Executive Director of the Sustained Dialogue Campus Network, joined in the conversation by providing students with the right tools to be able to encourage communication and promote dialogue around the language of hate.

    A common theme throughout the conference was the topic of positive reinforcement and using propaganda as a tool to focus on those individuals willing and ready to ignite change. Is it possible to rid the world of apathy and encourage a more active citizenry? Speakers at the conference emphasized the importance of taking initiative and simply starting somewhere. Personal education and resourcefulness is necessary for a leader to successfully execute their mission to start a movement or unite a community. Hate speech dissipates with knowledge and dialogue; and as agents of propaganda, individuals have the potential to effect change. Samantha Jacobson, student at Wesleyan University, learned how to harness her skills to spark change, “I discovered the power of dialogue as a mechanism for diverting the energy surrounding contentious issues away from biased or partisan beliefs and into a safe and productive space for compromise and progress.”

    How does verbal communication influence the way that people interpret information? Over time people have learned that language greatly influences propaganda and the way that message is received by an audience. Certain connotations associated with words present topics in stereotypical ways or with a slant or bias. People evaluate language based on previous knowledge or experience and the evocation of language greatly effects audience receptivity.

    The summit also presented new ways of thinking about propaganda as a tool to sell ideas and the ways in which information is presented to individuals as consumers. Is it possible to filter the information that we receive? Samantha shared her experience saying, “This summit inspired me to take on the role of a cautious consumer of the information that is readily available throughout the world around me. I now understand the power of my voice and how impacting just one person could be a step towards changing the world. I have learned that silence does not equate to righteous.” If people set aside their own bias and prejudice they will be more open to ideas and willing to facilitate communication and dialogue.

    The exhibit at the Holocaust Museum, State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda, detailed the ways in which individuals have been vulnerable to ideas presented in advertisements plastered on automobiles, buildings, cereal boxes and posters. Tim Kaiser, Director of Education for the Holocaust Museum, explained how propaganda is dependent upon the technique, means of communication, audience receptivity, and the environment and context in which it is presented. Still, as individuals, what we chose to read, who we interact with and the ways in which we filter information are all dependent upon our personal preferences and whether we want to see the world in a broad or limited scope.

    The summit challenged 50 young leaders to assess their personal leadership styles and think about new ways and new ideas to spread the message of peace to their local communities.

    Still questions remain…
    How do we create a world where hate cannot flourish?


    Why does hate perpetuate? How can we break the cycle?


    What steps can be taken in communities to dissipate hate and create conversation surrounding this prevalent issue?


    Monday, July 25, 2011

    Tuesday, 12:00PM Eastern webinar: "Know Thy Communication Style" using SMART Conversations

    PublicDecisions: PublicDecisions Blog
    Tuesday, 26 July PublicForum Webinar: Know Thy Communication Style


    • “Know Thy Communication Style” Using SMART Conversations® to speak your truth and enhance all of your relationships. A PublicForum Webinar
      • Date: Tuesday, July 26 Time: Noon-1:30 pm Eastern (New York) (60-minute webinar with optional 30 minute Q & A ) FREE* for Circle Club members $20* USD for nonmembers *Add $12 for telephone audio (no charge for computer audio) Registrants receive access to the session recording (a $20 value) and the program slide deck.
        • As individuals seeking self improvement or professional development, or as practitioners of public engagement, we need the skills to deal with people on the small, everyday matters as well as the elephants in the room. But how?
        • Dialogue is a foundational skill that can transform your conversations and give you the tools to communicate with authenticity, respect, and trust. In this webinar, you'll gain exposure to action dialogue and learn what it is, what it isn't, and how it can help you in your personal and professional life.
        • Our presenters are Paul Weisman/Smart Conversations® and Michele Simos/Smart Conversations® and Simos Consulting.

        If interested, please go to the PublicDecisions post for details.